FAMILY OF JULES CHEVALIER :

LAY ASSOCIATES

Klaus Sanders, msc

Assistant General

In an essay called 'The Layman in the Pre‑Reformation Parish', published forty years ago in a Catholic Truth Society pamphlet, Cardinal Aidan Gasquet relates the anecdote of an inquirer who asked a priest what was the position of the layman in the Catholic Church. "The layman has two positions", answered the priest. “He kneels before the altar, that is one. And he sits below the pulpit, that is the other.” The cardinal adds that there is a third that the priest had forgotten. The layman also puts his hands in his purse.

In a sense that is still so, and always will be so: there will never be a time when lay men and women are not on their knees before the altar and sitting before the pulpit, and for a long time yet they will have to put hand into purse. Nevertheless, now and for the future they do these things in a different way; or at least, doing these things, they feel differently about their position as a body in the Church. (Y. Congar, Lay People in the Church. London 1957 / 1959.)

The Mission of Jesus: Life-giving relationship and compassion

If one reads the Gospels carefully it is easy to discover that Jesus was ultimately rejected and put to death because of his way of interpreting the Torah in terms of justice and compassion. His healing on the Sabbath, his eating with the unclean, his table fellowship with the outcasts and sinners had only one aim: to create a new community in which life‑giving relationship would guarantee the fullness of life for every one and the end of all discrimination. In acting like this Jesus demonstrated what God's Kingdom was all about: the creation of a new community in which all would be brothers and sisters, where there would be no marginalisation anymore. Here all would be gathered into the one great family of all creatures according to the image and likeness of God the Three in one.

This was to be the precise mission of his disciples as well: to go out into the whole world and to gather people from all nations and races and cultures into this great new family of God. What does discipleship mean? Discipleship is first of all a gift ‑ by our baptism we all became members of the new family of God. Being a disciple means to share in a fundamental experience made and communicated by the master. It means to be caught up in the vision of the master, to be on fire with the fire of the master. It ultimately means to become like the master. A disciple is a person who has made the same fundamental experience that Jesus made. God loves every human person with an unconditional, compassionate love. He is always with us. A disciple is someone who starts living his daily life out of this experience and who sees his witnessing to this experience as taking part in Jesus' own mission and so become a co‑worker with God for the salvation / transformation of the world into God's final design. Every Christian is called to mission on the basis of the sacrament of Baptism. Baptism is not a passport to heaven or a ticket to enter into eternal life. It is a call to mission. Most people will find eternal life without being baptised. The privilege of being a Christian consists in having been called to participate in a special way in the mission of Christ to save all human beings. To be called means to “be consecrated", to be taken into God's plan. Because of this we all are "holy, consecrated, set apart” (klêros) to be sent out, to engage actively in God's mission, to become “fishers of men" (Mk 1, 17; see: John Fül1enbach SVD, Called to Mission. in SEDOS 96 /74)

Mission and role of the laity

The New Testament considers every baptised Christian as ‘consecrated’ to God. It is enough to recall the Pauline term, which speaks of Christians as hagioi, as saints. Furthermore, the NT never considers the ministers of the Church as sacred persons at the expense of other Christians. Quite the reverse, all Christians are chosen and called by God, and all build a clergy, clêros, which means a share, a heritage, a specific category consecrated to God (Col 1, 12; 1 Ptr 1,4).

Saint Paul teaches that each Christian receives the charisms of the Spirit for the service of the Church, and so receives gifts of service which are to be exercised in and for the Christian community (1 Cor 12).

All Christians are disciples of Jesus Christ and as disciples are sent into the world to share in the same mission as Jesus Christ.

The Church as a whole is ministerial; every Christian, ordained or not, is called to be at the service of the Christian community and of the world. The ministries of the laity are the direct fruit of baptism and confirmation. Lay people are apostles in the Church and for the world because they are baptised. Full participation in all the dimensions of the activity of the Church seems to be the order of the day, even though there is still a long way still to go to fulfil this ideal.

A more complete and global understanding sees the Church as communion, communio, where all Christians share responsibility for the whole, although in a different way. The Church, which in the past relied too exclusively on the clergy regarded as being a special class of Christians, has to become a Church of the whole people, a Church which takes into account all Christians according to the different gifts they have received from the Spirit. The reason for all this is the priority given to service, to a servant Church which is at the service of the Gospel in the world and for the world.

The NT never uses the term laïkos in spite of the fact that it already existed two centuries before in the classical Greek. The word laos does occur in the Bible, with the express meaning of the people of God, different from the other nations, the people consecrated to God. The first use of the word ‘lay’ In opposition to ‘priest’ is to be found in a Roman document, a letter sent to the community in Corinth and written by Pope Clement, a contemporary of the apostles (Congar, Jalons pour une Théologie du Laïcat. p. 20-21). The distinction between clergy and the laity is very clear in the literature of the beginning of the third century (Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen). The words ‘high priest’ (archiereus) and ‘priest’ (hiereus) were used only for Christ (Hebrews) and for the entire Christian community (1 Ptr 2,9 “But you are a chosen race, a kingdom of priests, a holy nation, a people to be a personal possession to sing the praises of God who called you out of the darkness in to his wonderful light”; Apoc 1,6; 5, 10).

To characterise the functions of the clergy in the Church as sacred and those of the laity as secular presents many theological difficulties. It is easy to understand the sacraments as essentially sacred activities. But if ordained ministers are called to preside at their celebration, the laity also is called to participate fully at their celebration. The sacraments are not exclusively the business of the clergy. They belong essentially to the life of all Christians. Otherwise, if they don't participate in their celebration, they are called non‑practising Christians.

Every activity fulfilled by a Christian, whether an ordained minister or not, is, if fulfilled at least implicitly in the name of Christ and for Christ, a sacred activity. If this activity is not fulfilled in the name of Christ and for Christ at least implicitly, the person doing it does not act as a Christian. It is only the act of a human person. We must not forget the famous dictum of Paul to the Christians: “Whether you eat, then, or drink, or whatever else you do, do it all for the glory of God” (1Cor 10,31). To proclaim the word and to listen to it, to celebrate the sacraments are activities shared in by the clergy and the laity, the only difference being in the way each group and each individual takes part in the celebration.

Vatican II, far from resolving all theological questions about the laity or even about the clergy, had often left these questions open. The theology of the laity is very recent in the Church and has undergone vigorous development. Vatican II was the first ecumenical Council which devoted a whole document to the laity.

I think it is important to see that the Church in its entirety is called ‘to serve’. Its members, ordained or not, fulfil a multitude of ministries and services. We have to see the Church as essentially a communion of equal members, a communion sent into the world by Christ to serve through the innumerable gifts of the Holy Spirit.

Lumen Gentium makes the distinction between common priesthood and ministerial priesthood. Vatican II affirms that these two “differ essentially and not only in degree” (art. 10), On the other hand art. 32 asserts the radical equality of all the members of the people of God. The problem is to define more precisely the common priesthood.

If we understand the common priesthood as participation in Christ's priesthood with its different services and roles in the Church and in the world, fulfilled in virtue of baptism and confirmation according to the gifts of the Spirit, then we have not just two different groups in the Church but as many groups as there are gifts of the Spirit. Every believer is responsible for the Church and for the world, but everybody according to his or her own gifts.

Lay people are, by right, full members in the Church. They are not just people who need to be told what to do and when. The Church is not a society where some individuals give the orders and take all the initiatives, and the others have to listen and to obey. The Holy Spirit does not speak only to those who are in authority. "It blows where It pleases" (Jo 3,8). Therefore, those in authority have to be attentive to what the Spirit says through all the members of the Church.

The word “klêros”, from which our word “clergy” comes, relates to the entire People of God in the NT, because all “share the inheritance (lot, “klêros”) of God's holy people" (Col 1,12; see Acts 20,32; 26,18; 1 Ptr 1,4). They are named “those who are called, elected, chosen by God”; they are “the saints”; they form “a chosen race, a kingdom of priests, a holy nation” (1 Ptr 2,9).It is not admissible to look at the clergy as 'sacred' at the expense of the other believers.

The clergy and the laity have to work hand in hand to transform the reality of the world into God's design and to live the inner life of the Church called by the NT "koinonia", with the meaning of communion with God and with one another. We have to avoid speaking of a double vocation or mission: one in relation to the Church which would be for the clergy, and the other in relation to the world which would be for the laity. All Christians have a vocation or a mission in relation to the Church and another one in relation to the world, though they share in them in a different way.

Lay people are full members of the Church and have a mission for the Church and for the world. From this point of view there is no difference between clergy and laity. With regard to leadership in the Church there is and there will be a difference. It is the ordained ministers who are the ones who normally preside in the Church, and specially for the celebration of the sacraments and of the Word. But in many cases quite a number of lay people are called to exercise a real leadership in the Church, a leadership which is not in competition with ordained ministers.

(see: Eugène Lapointe, OMI, Mission et Rô1e du laïcat dans l’Eglise. Position d'une Eglise d'Afrique. SEDOS 99/73)

Laity of the Jules Chevalier Family

Father Jules Chevalier, founder of the congregations of the MSC, the FDNSC and, with Father Hubert Linckens, of the MSC Sisters, did not elaborate a structure for his congregations from theoretical principles. He was living the urgency of the mission; all the structures he was giving to his organisation had the main purpose to realise that mission, i.e. to continue the mission of Jesus himself and in this way to fight against the destructive evils of society.

The common mission of the three congregations is a mission without frontiers, open to all kinds of work and apostolates. It is among other things what Fr Chevalier wanted to express when he chose a motto: “May the Sacred Heart of Jesus be loved everywhere.”

Thus the goal of the community is to let Jesus Christ be known as well as the love flowing from his Heart. Jules Chevalier was convinced that the devotion to the Sacred Heart was an answer to the evils of his time.

A proper understanding of Fr. Chevalier's idea of mission is essential for a correct understanding of the importance of the laity for him. When we read his first publications on the nature and mission of the Society, we have the strong impression that it was unthinkable for him or maybe ‘impracticable’ to speak of changing the world and its values without the participation of the laity, since they are more immersed in the world. The religious priests, brothers and sisters together with the secular priests have an essential role to play, but if the mission must progress at all the levels of society, then the role of the laity is at least as essential.

Fr. Chevalier was convinced that a religious congregation in itself was not enough as a missionary force. It is for this reason that he often came back in his early writings to the structure of three branches of the Society. For example, in a brochure published in 1866, Les Missionnaires du Sacré Coeur he wrote: They (Missionaries of the Sacred Heart of Jesus) must be truly religious in order to resemble him more closely whose Kingdom they want to spread. At the same time, they must keep as close contact as possible with the clergy, in order to spread everywhere the divine influence of the Sacred Heart.... And finally, a lay third order will penetrate where the priests would not be able. In this way, if it is possible, nothing will be allowed to escape the rebirth that comes through the influence of the Sacred Heart of Jesus" (op. cit. p. 8).

As a result, Fr. Chevalier had accepted that for the same mission to be effective, it should necessarily include a variety of groups. Each of these groups had its own way to accomplish the unique and same mission.

The MSC, the Daughters of OLSH, the MSC Sisters have been inspired by his vision and his example. To support each other, many of the laity feel they are called to incarnate the same ideals and the same vision, keeping and underlining their status as laity. They bring new challenges and possibilities to a vast ecclesial movement. The charism of the Founder unites consecrated persons and laity who recognise each other as united and animated by the same ideals of life and mission.

In 1993 the General Chapter of the MSC approved a document which underlines the authentic and important role of the laity in “the project of three branches.” CS 61: “Our Founder wanted the fullness of mission to be realised in a global project with religious men and women, diocesan priests and lay people. He especially wished to have an Association of lay people closely united with the professed members in their spirituality and mission (Constitutions 1877) ".

The last FDNSC General Chapter in 1993 as well as the MSC Sisters' General Chapter in 1990 have recognised the important place of lay people in the vision of Father Chevalier. The FDNSC Chapter has put the ‘Promotion of the Laity’ on its list of priorities and "affirms the many initiatives concerning the laity that are already being undertaken in different provinces.... and encourages provinces which have associates to support them in their commitment to live our spirit and mission”.

The MSC Sisters’ Chapter "encourages all provinces regions and districts to study the issue of lay associates and to initiate such an association"…. The General Council of the MSC Sisters declares: We believe that the association of laity complements, strengthens and enriches our commitment to our Spirituality and Mission.... We encourage our Sisters to promote Fr. Chevalier's dream of having an association of laity working hand in hand with us as we strive to make the Sacred Heart of Jesus known and loved everywhere.....

The mutual relations between religious and lay people must be characterised by communion and complementarity. The communion between the two forms leads to understanding and reciprocal appreciation, to sympathy for the persons and for the respective way of life, to a sharing of gifts.

From this communion and this complementarity grow up an enrichment and a reciprocal support between religious and the laity. Thus we can have within the “spiritual family” a real experience of ecclesial community which allows us to go beyond the anonymity or the structural membership while the diversities of the groups are respected.

The specific structures of the lay associates must be defined by the laity itself in a realistic discernment, which respects the life of the different groups and the different contexts. However, the structures of interdependence between religious and lay associates need to be defined in a true dialogue and in mutual respect for the two forms of life, so that all can draw water from the same spiritual well, while living the concrete forms of incarnation in accordance to the situation.

The number of countries having lay associates of the Chevalier Family is growing. We find them in Africa (Benin, Cameroon, South Africa, Zaire/Congo), Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Dominican Republic, England, France/ Switzerland, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Peru, Spain, USA, Venezuela.

The first “International Meeting of the Lay Associates of the Jules Chevalier Family” in Issoudun 1995 had found a very positive echo. All the participants, religious and laity, about 160, had been deeply convinced that they had lived an intense time during this week of meeting and sharing in the spirit of Fr. Chevalier. The second “International Meeting of the Lay Associates of the Jules Chevalier Family” (19 - 25 July 1999) was also a great success. Again more than 160 participants from 22 countries came to Issoudun. This meeting, on the initiative of the Council of the Laity MSC France/Switzerland, demonstrated the vitality of the lay branch of the Chevalier Family. A charter was accepted as a common basis for all those who see themselves as "Lay Missionaries of the Sacred Heart". The assembly voted unanimously for a basic structure: a board of international communion, which has its place of reference in Miribel, in contact with Issoudun.